Technology
YouTube won’t take action on videos that target a reporter’s race and sexuality
A week ago, Vox reporter Carlos Maza decided he’d had enough after years of abuse.
On Twitter, Maza called out YouTube for failing to enforce its anti-harassment policies against right-wing commentator Steven Crowder, who has repeatedly made reference to Maza’s sexual orientation and race in his videos.
“I’ve been called an anchor baby, a lispy queer, a Mexican, etc,” Maza said in a tweet. “These videos get millions of views on YouTube. Every time one gets posted, I wake up to a wall of homophobic/racist abuse on Instagram and Twitter.”
Since I started working at Vox, Steven Crowder has been making video after video “debunking” Strikethrough. Every single video has included repeated, overt attacks on my sexual orientation and ethnicity. Here’s a sample: pic.twitter.com/UReCcQ2Elj
— Carlos Maza (@gaywonk) May 31, 2019
On Tuesday night, YouTube finally responded to the furore by deeming Crowder’s videos as not violating its policies.
“Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don’t violate our policies, they’ll remain on our site,” the statement read.
Responding to Mashable’s enquiries, the company said Crowder’s content did not violate its policies.
These policies prohibit content which incites others to harass or threaten individuals on or off YouTube, or reveal’s someones personal information. To repeat: YouTube has deemed Crowder’s videos broke none of those rules.
(3/4) As an open platform, it’s crucial for us to allow everyone–from creators to journalists to late-night TV hosts–to express their opinions w/in the scope of our policies. Opinions can be deeply offensive, but if they don’t violate our policies, they’ll remain on our site.
— TeamYouTube (@TeamYouTube) June 4, 2019
(4/4) Even if a video remains on our site, it doesn’t mean we endorse/support that viewpoint.
There are other aspects of the channel that we’re still evaluating– we’ll be in touch with any further updates.
— TeamYouTube (@TeamYouTube) June 4, 2019
YouTube’s response set off a wave of criticism against the company, especially as it boasts its pro-LGBTQ community credentials for Pride Month.
on the one hand: YouTube is making money off the targeted harassment of LGBTQ people and essentially said repeatedly calling a Cuban American a “lispy queer Mexican” is fine on their platform.
on the other hand: their logo is rainbow!!— JuanPa (@jpbrammer) June 5, 2019
YouTube is actively & purposely making our society worse, every day, for profit
— Rob Rousseau (@robrousseau) June 5, 2019
Maza was, to say the least, exasperated by YouTube’s response.
“YouTube has decided that targeted racist and homophobic harassment does not violate its policies against hate speech or harassment. That’s an absolutely batshit policy that gives bigots free license,” he tweeted.
In another tweet, he wrote: “I don’t know what else LGBT people are supposed to do. I compiled the clips for them. I sent them everything. Publicly begged them to pay attention. It’s never enough. Because YouTube does not give a fuck about protecting marginalized people, and it never has.”
I don’t know what else LGBT people are supposed to do. I compiled the clips for them. I sent them everything. Publicly begged them to pay attention.
It’s never enough. Because @YouTube does not give a fuck about protecting marginalized people, and it never has.
— Carlos Maza (@gaywonk) June 4, 2019
In a statement, Vox Media publisher Melissa Bell said YouTube’s platform and system is broken “in ways that we can’t tolerate.”
“By refusing to take a stand on hate speech, they allow the worst of their communities to hide behind cries of ‘free speech’ and ‘fake news’ all while increasingly targeting people with the most offensive and odious harassment,” the statement reads.
“They encourage their fans to follow suit and we now see our reporters and creators consistently targeted by the worst abuse online, with no remedy or ability to protect themselves.”
-
Entertainment7 days ago
Election 2024: The truth about voting machine security
-
Entertainment6 days ago
Teen AI companion: How to keep your child safe
-
Entertainment6 days ago
‘Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl’ review: A delightful romp with an anti-AI streak
-
Entertainment5 days ago
‘Dragon Age: The Veilguard’ review: BioWare made a good game again
-
Entertainment5 days ago
Polling 101: Weighting, probability panels, recall votes, and reaching people by mail
-
Entertainment4 days ago
‘Only Murders in the Building’ Season 4 ending explained: Who killed Sazz and why?
-
Entertainment4 days ago
5 Dyson Supersonic dupes worth the hype in 2024
-
Entertainment3 days ago
When will we have 2024 election results online?