Technology
What went wrong with the Boeing Starliner launch
The inaugural flight of Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner went awry Friday morning when the spacecraft failed to achieve its correct orbit, cancelling its planned trip to the International Space Station.
Not only was this the first test flight of Boeing’s ship, but it was a major step in NASA’s plan to let private companies take over manned space flights to the ISS.
Things started off promising enough with the Starliner’s liftoff, a picture-perfect launch into the early morning Florida sky.
Both Boeing and NASA chief Jim Bridenstine indicated the first sign of trouble via Twitter about 50 minutes after the 6:36 a.m. ET launch.
Starliner has an off-nominal insertion, but we have spacecraft control. The guidance and control team is assessing their next maneuver.
— Boeing Space (@BoeingSpace) December 20, 2019
Starliner in stable orbit. The burn needed for a rendezvous with the ISS did not happen. Working the issue.
— Jim Bridenstine (@JimBridenstine) December 20, 2019
At a press conference following the launch, NASA chief Jim Bridenstine explained exactly what went wrong.
“We did not get the insertion burn we were hoping for,” he said. But following a successful liftoff, the Starliner’s Missions Elapsed Timing system “had an error in it,” according to Bridenstine. Boeing’s Jim Chilton later said they don’t yet know what caused the error.
Essentially, the Starliner thought the time that had elapsed “was different than it actually was,” said Bridenstine. As a result, the craft burned more fuel than it should have, trying to “maintain a very precise control that it normally wouldn’t have tried to maintain.”
Update: #Starliner had a Mission Elapsed Time (MET) anomaly causing the spacecraft to believe that it was in an orbital insertion burn, when it was not. More information at 9am ET: https://t.co/wwsfqqvLN7
— Jim Bridenstine (@JimBridenstine) December 20, 2019
By the time signals were sent to the craft to make its orbital insertion burn, it was too late. With that fuel spent, the rendezvous with the ISS wasn’t possible, Bridenstine said.
Bridenstine took great pains, however, to make things look less dire than the failed orbit implied, saying, “Today, a lot of things went right… This is why we test.”
Starliner is in an unplanned, but safe orbit. (@ulalaunch Atlas 5 worked perfectly). Looking at options and landing early is one of them… headed to NM to join the recovery team. Ops team doing an outstanding job putting Starliner in position for all options.
— Christopher Ferguson (@Astro_Ferg) December 20, 2019
While the Starliner is a passenger spacecraft, designed to shuttle people to and from space, Friday’s flight was an unmanned mission to the ISS. But Bridenstine emphasized that had this flight been manned, the crew would have been safe and could have possibly been able to fix the issue to rendezvous with the ISS.
In fact, because engineers were able to get the craft into a stable orbit, even if it wasn’t the planned one, Boeing and NASA are still looking at running tests while the Starliner is in space, and landing the craft at a facility at White Sands, New Mexico.
The earliest landing would occur early Sunday morning but that time could change.
-
Entertainment6 days ago
‘Only Murders in the Building’ Season 4 ending explained: Who killed Sazz and why?
-
Entertainment5 days ago
When will we have 2024 election results online?
-
Entertainment7 days ago
5 Dyson Supersonic dupes worth the hype in 2024
-
Entertainment4 days ago
Halloween 2024: Weekend debates, obscure memes, and a legacy of racism
-
Entertainment6 days ago
Social media drives toxic fandom. Is there a solution?
-
Entertainment4 days ago
Is ‘The Substance’ streaming? How to watch at home
-
Entertainment4 days ago
M4 MacBook Pro vs. M3 MacBook Pro: What are the differences?
-
Entertainment3 days ago
‘A Real Pain’ review: Jesse Eisenberg and Kieran Culkin charm as odd-couple cousins