How Slack’s Cal Henderson survived 2 failed startups and a Yahoo sale

Slack’s cofounder and CTO Cal
Henderson.
Slack

• Slack is a popular workplace messaging service worth $7.1
  billion and reportedly on the verge of going public.
• Its founding team, including British CTO Cal Henderson, have
  weathered a lot of successes and failures to get Slack where it
  is today.
• That includes trying and failing with to start two gaming
  companies, and selling the photo site Flickr to Yahoo.
• Henderson said after the founders’ experiences with Yahoo,
  Slack is committed to staying independent and says it has a
  strong chance against its key rival Microsoft because it’s only
  focused on one product.

Slack’s cofounder and chief technology officer, Cal Henderson,
will be a wealthy man if the workspace chat company goes
public as expected in 2019.

The company has revolutionised office communications with a
lightweight, browser-based chat service that allows colleagues to
talk and share files.

Slack wasn’t the first to try and make office collaboration
easier, but it quickly beat out Microsoft and Hipchat thanks to
its whimsical graphics and millennial-friendly features like GIFs
and emoji.

Slack is now reportedly worth $7.1 billion after raising millions
in venture backing from SoftBank and others like Accel and
General Atlantic.

It has 8 million daily active users —
a surprisingly small number — and it thinks it can win over
hundreds of millions more, talking about a “total addressable
market” of 600 million knowledge workers. The company has yet to
turn a profit, but says it has 3 million paid users.

Cal Henderson, despite being with Slack since the very beginning,
didn’t intend to end up here.

Cal Henderson is a British programmer who keeps trying and
failing to build gaming companies

When Henderson was living in London in the early 2000s, he came
across a browser-based social game called “Game Neverending.”

“It was a type of point-and-click type adventure,” Henderson told
Business Insider in an October interview. “It’s not like you
could win, it was an exploratory social gamespace.”

The game was, Henderson, said “hard to explain, which is also the
reason why it wasn’t successful.”

But he was fascinated by the casual, social nature of the game,
which pre-dated massive online worlds like World of Warcraft and
social media gaming like Zynga’s FarmVille. He got in touch with
the game’s development team, headed up by president Stewart
Butterfield, and harassed them to let him join.

Slack CEO Stewart
Butterfield.
Beck
Diefenbach/Reuters

Butterfield and the team were operating out of Vancouver and
quickly running out of cash for developing Game Neverending. They
came up with a plan: Build a secondary service that would
generate the revenue to fund the game’s development.

They recruited Henderson as chief software architect promising
him that, eventually, he would get to work on Game Neverending’s
development. Despite not having met the team, Henderson agreed.

And so the photo site Flickr was born.

Flickr.
Flickr

The original version of Flickr, Henderson said, was a real-time
chatroom that let people share photos. “It was a lot more like
Slack,” he said. “And it didn’t work. You had to be online at the
same time as the other person wanting to use Flickr for it to
make sense. It was fun to play with in the office, but in real
life nobody used it.”

At this point, Henderson still hadn’t met any of the team. He did
eventually meet them when the company gathered together in
California to launch the first version of Flickr, which promptly
failed.

But then came further iterations, and the team landed on the idea
of hosting photos on web pages. Henderson moved to Vancouver with
everyone else to work on the new version full-time and, in his
words: “I just never went home.”

It became clear that Flickr was where the money was at. Flickr
began to grow quickly, and it was obvious that it was bigger than
just a money-spinner for Game Neverending.

“Reluctantly we shut down development on the game and
concentrated the company on Flickr,” said Henderson.

Around a year after launch, Yahoo acquired Flickr for a reported
$25 million. At the time, hardcore early users were unhappy about
the change in ownership, although Henderson notes that Flickr
only grew its user base hugely after the sale.

Despite the purported benefits of going to a bigger company, like
having the cash to grow more quickly, Henderson described the
process as “hugely frustrating.”

Although the company was originally bigger than the then-nascent
Facebook and YouTube, and pre-dated Twitter, Flickr wasn’t given
sufficient resources to grow, as Henderson tells it. The company
which had widely been described as the world’s best photo-sharing
service
quickly stagnated.

Then, Henderson said: “Facebook took us over, YouTube on the
video side, then eventually Instagram came around and won mobile
for photos. So it was super frustrating.”

The Flickr team tried to build a second game — and failed again

Three years after the Flickr acquisition, Butterfield and his
cofounders resigned in spectacular fashion. Like Henderson,
Butterfield was not flattering about Yahoo,
describing it to journalist Mat Honan as “a terrible joke.”
He was right — Yahoo would slowly fall apart thanks to poor
leadership and numerous bad decisions around acquisitions.

Freed from the confines of Yahoo, the Flickr gang would reunite
to finally build their hit game. This time round, with a
successful exit to Yahoo, there wouldn’t be any issues with
drumming up cash from investors. Butterfield’s new company Tiny
Speck raised more than $12 million from famed Silicon Valley
investors Andreessen Horowitz and Accel, and began work on new
game Glitch.

Glitch.
Glitch

Glitch was a well-designed, Flash-based browser game with cute
graphics and the ability to play collaboratively with other
players.

“Really, it was trying to build those really old, online MUDs
[multi-user dungeons], those mostly social spaces, and turn that
into a browser-based social space game. That’s what we tried to
do with Glitch,” Henderson said.

MUDs were multiplayer online games, usually text-based. They were
popular from the early days of the internet through to the 2000s,
but were superseded by graphics-based worlds like World of
Warcraft. Fans loved them as much for their social interaction as
the gameplay, although few MUDs ever made money.

“[Glitch] was a lot more graphical than those very early games,”
Henderson said.

Read more: Google once rejected this founder
for a job — but then went on to acquire his first startup and
partner with his 2nd

But: “It really didn’t work out. We spent four years on it and
after spending a whole bunch of investor money, we hadn’t build a
game that would ever become a viable business.”

It was expensive to keep running the game, and Tiny Speck failed
to find a buyer to fund its development costs. Flash turned
out to have been a bad bet.

Glitch

Failure to create a successful game was, Henderson said, a
harrowing experience. Tiny Speck laid off staff, winding the game
down, and telling its players that Glitch would no longer be
available. There were around 50 people employed at Tiny Speck at
the time, and a big proportion were game specialists. Most had to
go.

At this point, Butterfield and co realised they probably had to
give up trying to build games.

“We knew we wanted to work together again and that we wanted to
build something, but it wasn’t going to be a game, because we’d
really fucked that up after four years and our original vision,”
Henderson said. “I think the first time around, pre-Flickr, it
felt like we failed because we had everything against us. It
turns out the second time around we failed because… we’re bad at
making games. We had every possible advantage the second time
around.”

A little like Flickr and Game Neverending, Slack’s chat service
was likewise famously a side-product of Glitch.

Slack’s chat service.
Slack

When
Tiny Speck shuttered Glitch in 2012, the company announced it
would keep developing its “unique messaging technology.”

Although Slack now feels like an overnight success, it took $1.2
billion in total investment and a further four years before the
company really took off.

And Henderson has had to move from being a founding CTO to
running a team of around 500 people. Given Slack isn’t as big as
Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon, how does he retain talent?

“We’re kind of in an interesting adolescence, because we’re not a
young small startup any more,” Henderson said. “We’re very
established, especially in the Bay Area, we’re more than 1,200
people. We’re not public, so it’s very different to joining a
Google or Facebook where you know where they’ll be in a year’s
time, and it’s not early-stage risk.”

That means selling people on the fact that Slack makes a
meaningful difference to the way people work.

Slack has also achieved what appears
to be impossible for everyone else in Silicon Valley:
Diversity. Women make up 30% of Slack’s technical roles and
almost 50% of its leadership roles. Underrepresented minorities —
excluding Asian — make up 11% of US leadership roles.

By comparison, women account for 25% of technical roles at
Google, and only 26% of leadership roles. Underrepresented
minorities make up 4.2% of leadership roles.

“There are four founders of the company, and we’re all white
dudes,” said Henderson, referring to himself, Stewart
Butterfield, Eric Costello, and Serguei Mourachov. “And if you’re
not intentional about diversity early on then it gets harder to
dig yourself out of that hole. It’s not just women in
engineering, but people from all underrepresented minorities. We
were aware we needed to address that very early.”

Slack is determined not to sell out this time around

Henderson is adamant that Slack will stay independent after the
team was burned by its experiences at Yahoo.

“We’re very committed to remaining independent,” he said.

Its main competition remains Microsoft, which has just acquired

the AI startup behind a popular Slack chatbot. The Redmond
giant also made
a free version of its Slack rival Teams available, to try and
persuade small businesses and freelancers onto the platform.

But, Henderson points out, Microsoft is one giant (and old)
company trying to do lots of different things. Slack has the
advantage of focusing on one service, and it can move more
quickly.

“The Microsoft competition is really good for us,” he said. “When
we first started the company and built the product, we were eight
people that had a belief that Slack would be useful… it was all
very well for us to believe that as startup founders who have to
drink their own Kool-Aid.

“It’s very validating that [Microsoft] believe this is a software
category which is going to exist in a decade, which is going to
be very important.”

Microsoft’s Slack rival, Teams.
Microsoft

He added: “We make exactly one product that we care about, the
lifeblood of our company. We concentrate everything on it. We
make one thing. The other advantage is that at the core of Slack
is it’s a collaboration hub for all the different bits of
software you have in the workplace, and we are able to partner
with all of those organisations, whether it’s Microsoft or Google
or SalesForce.”

With two young children and a company with a bright future to
run, Henderson doesn’t have a lot of time for games, though he
lists Animal Crossing and Stardew Valley among his current
favourites. But he still keeps the fire of hope alive along with
some other game enthusiasts at the firm.

“We have a channel inside Slack’s Slack called ‘Games we might
finish,’ where we talk about projects that we’ve started, and
which are languishing,” Henderson said. “I’ve been working on
this game for about two years, which I’ve written some of the
outline of, and which I’ve got really good ideas about, but I’ve
not found the time to really do anything.”

But, he concludes: “I’m definitely going to finish this one.”